This statement is false because delaying recommendations for improvements until project closure defeats the purpose of continuous quality improvement. Addressing quality gaps as soon as they are identified helps to mitigate risks, reduce costs associated with rework, and ensures that the project meets the expected quality standards throughout its duration. Waiting until the end of the project may lead to increased project costs and reduced stakeholder satisfaction.
Ask Bash
Bash is our AI bot, trained to help you pass your exam. AI Generated Content may display inaccurate information, always double-check anything important.
What are quality gaps in project management?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
What is continuous quality improvement?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
Why is it important to address quality issues during a project rather than at closure?
Open an interactive chat with Bash
This question's topic:
PMI Project Management Professional (PMP) /
Process
Report Issue
Oh snap!
Loading...
Loading...
Join premium for unlimited access and more features